If you are not confused, you're not paying attention.
~ Tom Peters
Well, maybe I wasn't paying enough attention, but it didn't seem all that difficult...
The first steps were to interface the 2 button bands and then fold and press 5/8th inch along one long edge:
Next they get folded (inside out) along the mid-line:
Then the bottom was stitched closed and trimmed:
And they were turned right-side out again - finishing the bottom edge:
Then it was time to attach them to the shirt. The unpressed, raw edge was aligned along the raw edge of the front center of the shirt and stitched:
I graded the seam and pressed it in towards the band (away from the front of the shirt):
Finally, the band was folded over onto itself and I stitched in the ditch to complete it. (Slip stitching was another option.)
It generally went pretty easily and came out pretty good. The only issue I had was that the bottom didn't line up quite as nicely as when the shirt is self-faced...
I don't know why I've dreaded these and avoided them for so long - it really wasn't too bad. Tomorrow I've got pictures of the final shirt being modeled by a certain handsome someone... ;)
What about you? Do you prefer a button band or a pattern with a self-faced shirt front? What do you think are the advantages and disadvantages of the button band?
Great sewing! A placket is more tailored looking and more expensive on a RTW shirt than a cut-on facing. A stand-up collar or collar band looks nicer, I think, with a placket. On the other hand, a cut-on facing is beautiful with some collars such as a PeterPan. So, it depends on what style one is going for.
ReplyDeleteHey Gwen - this is very interesting! For some reason, I just assumed that the separate button band was always better - but it's good to know that each type has its role, depending on the style. :)
DeleteThanks! :)
I hope the preparation for the move is going well. :)
All the best,
Gwen